Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Victoria Kan vs Caroline Werner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kan vs Werner analysis and find out who is favored!
Victoria Kan vs Caroline Werner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kan 1 - 0 Werner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kan has won 47.43% of points on their second serve, while Werner has won 47.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kan, in recent form, has won 58.04% of their opponent's second serve points, while Werner has won 57.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.13% and 46.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kan has saved 60.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Werner has saved 55.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kan has won 70% of matches played (W/L 21/ 9), with Werner winning 73.81% (W/L 31/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 297/ 97), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22). Werner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 60/ 40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 26/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Kan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 20/ 8), where as Werner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kan winning 1 times and Werner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kan winning 2 and Werner winning 0. The last match between Kan and Werner was at the W25 Caserta, 22-05-2019, First, Clay with Victoria Kan getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kan and Werner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kan winning 0 times and Werner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kan winning 0, and Werner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kan has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.4 while Werner has played against players with an average rank of 144.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Werner has won 14% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kan has converted 57.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Werner has converted 51.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
679
Rank
151
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
760
Rank
361
High
28
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
71% (360-149)
Career Total W/L
57% (237-181)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
73% (27-10)
$30,766
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Victoria Kan vs Caroline Werner For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kan VS Werner
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Victoria Kan | Caroline Werner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:0 | 1:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (31/61) | 58% (28/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (23/31) | 61% (17/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 20% (4/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (27/48) | 39% (24/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Victoria Kan
Player
Caroline Werner
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Victoria Kan | Caroline Werner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 73% (27/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (23/13) | 74% (59/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (180/135) | 62% (443/272) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 69% (11/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 76% (16/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 32 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:18 | 1:5:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.31 | 163.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (610/1116) | 66% (1011/1532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (390/610) | 62% (627/1011) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (240/506) | 47% (245/521) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (73/127) | 52% (118/229) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (486/1000) | 51% (803/1578) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 73% (8/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 73% (19/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 73% (27/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 17% (1/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 90% (30/27) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 10% (30/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Victoria Kan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Victoria Kan
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Maria Toma
53%
(
58 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Alexandra Osborne
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Victoria Kan
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
42%
(
25 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Victoria Kan
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Amarni Banks
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Marine Szostak
40%
(
27 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
8
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Victoria Kan
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Kan
Player
Emma Slavikova
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Caroline Werner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Caroline Werner
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Magali Kempen
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Alexandra Osborne
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Audrey Albie
Player
Caroline Werner
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
0
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
Break Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
60%
(
59 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Ines Leon
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
37%
(
17 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
38%
(
13 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
62%
(
31 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
43
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 0-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Kan Vs Werner Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kan are available here and Werner photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
